This is the week that I'll be talking with Dr. S about version #1 of my proposal. In the meantime, I continue to work (re-work, and re-work) my research problems. At this revision stage (and no telling what Dr. S will say about the research problems), I've written and rewritten the research problems...now on my third major revision. My conclusions, thus far, are these:- Research PROBLEMS arise from the literature review; while
- Research HYPOTHESES are solved by the analysis.
Now, I have absolutely NO idea if this is correct or not, but it essentially means that the literature review (Chapter 2 of five total chapters) has to be complete before the research problems are "fully cooked." And the analysis done in Chapters 3 and 4 has to be finished in order to prove the hypotheses. As Chapter 1 is just a write-up of the proposal outline, there's a circular problem: I have to do all of the analysis and literature review for the dissertation in order to get my proposal outline approved. So I'm writing a dissertation before I even know that the thing is approved? This doesn't make any sense. Or maybe I'm thinking too much.
No comments:
Post a Comment